Table of Contents
AtLeastOneConstructor
Since: PMD 1.04
Priority: Medium (3)
Each non-static class should declare at least one constructor. Classes with solely static members are ignored, refer to UseUtilityClassRule to detect those.
This rule is defined by the following Java class: net.sourceforge.pmd.lang.java.rule.codestyle.AtLeastOneConstructorRule
Example(s):
public class Foo {
// missing constructor
public void doSomething() { ... }
public void doOtherThing { ... }
}
This rule has the following properties:
Name | Default Value | Description |
---|---|---|
ignoredAnnotations | lombok.Data , lombok.Value , lombok.Builder , lombok.NoArgsConstructor , lombok.RequiredArgsConstructor , lombok.AllArgsConstructor | Fully qualified names of the annotation types that should be ignored by this rule |
Use this rule with the default properties by just referencing it:
<rule ref="category/java/codestyle.xml/AtLeastOneConstructor" />
Use this rule and customize it:
<rule ref="category/java/codestyle.xml/AtLeastOneConstructor">
<properties>
<property name="ignoredAnnotations" value="lombok.Data,lombok.Value,lombok.Builder,lombok.NoArgsConstructor,lombok.RequiredArgsConstructor,lombok.AllArgsConstructor" />
</properties>
</rule>
AvoidDollarSigns
Since: PMD 1.5
Priority: Medium (3)
Avoid using dollar signs in variable/method/class/interface names.
This rule is defined by the following XPath expression:
//ClassDeclaration [contains(@SimpleName, '$')]
| //EnumDeclaration [contains(@SimpleName, '$')]
| //AnnotationTypeDeclaration [contains(@SimpleName, '$')]
| //RecordDeclaration [contains(@SimpleName, '$')]
| //VariableId [contains(@Name, '$')]
| //MethodDeclaration [contains(@Name, '$')]
Example(s):
public class Fo$o { // not a recommended name
}
Use this rule by referencing it:
<rule ref="category/java/codestyle.xml/AvoidDollarSigns" />
AvoidProtectedFieldInFinalClass
Since: PMD 2.1
Priority: Medium (3)
Do not use protected fields in final classes since they cannot be subclassed. Clarify your intent by using private or package access modifiers instead.
This rule is defined by the following XPath expression:
//ClassDeclaration[@Final = true()]
/ClassBody
/FieldDeclaration[@Visibility = "protected"]
Example(s):
public final class Bar {
private int x;
protected int y; // bar cannot be subclassed, so is y really private or package visible?
Bar() {}
}
Use this rule by referencing it:
<rule ref="category/java/codestyle.xml/AvoidProtectedFieldInFinalClass" />
AvoidProtectedMethodInFinalClassNotExtending
Since: PMD 5.1
Priority: Medium (3)
Do not use protected methods in most final classes since they cannot be subclassed. This should only be allowed in final classes that extend other classes with protected methods (whose visibility cannot be reduced). Clarify your intent by using private or package access modifiers instead.
This rule is defined by the following XPath expression:
//ClassDeclaration[@Final= true() and not(ExtendsList)]
/ClassBody
/MethodDeclaration[@Visibility="protected" and @Name != 'finalize']
Example(s):
public final class Foo {
private int bar() {}
protected int baz() {} // Foo cannot be subclassed, and doesn't extend anything, so is baz() really private or package visible?
}
Use this rule by referencing it:
<rule ref="category/java/codestyle.xml/AvoidProtectedMethodInFinalClassNotExtending" />
AvoidUsingNativeCode
Since: PMD 4.1
Priority: Medium High (2)
Unnecessary reliance on Java Native Interface (JNI) calls directly reduces application portability and increases the maintenance burden.
This rule is defined by the following XPath expression:
//MethodCall[TypeExpression/ClassType[pmd-java:typeIs('java.lang.System')]
and @MethodName = 'loadLibrary']
Example(s):
public class SomeJNIClass {
public SomeJNIClass() {
System.loadLibrary("nativelib");
}
static {
System.loadLibrary("nativelib");
}
public void invalidCallsInMethod() throws SecurityException, NoSuchMethodException {
System.loadLibrary("nativelib");
}
}
Use this rule by referencing it:
<rule ref="category/java/codestyle.xml/AvoidUsingNativeCode" />
BooleanGetMethodName
Since: PMD 4.0
Priority: Medium Low (4)
Methods that return boolean results should be named as predicate statements to denote this. I.e, ‘isReady()’, ‘hasValues()’, ‘canCommit()’, ‘willFail()’, etc. Avoid the use of the ‘get’ prefix for these methods.
This rule is defined by the following XPath expression:
//MethodDeclaration
[starts-with(@Name, 'get')]
[@Arity = 0 or $checkParameterizedMethods = true()]
[ PrimitiveType[@Kind = 'boolean'] and @Overridden = false() ]
Example(s):
public boolean getFoo(); // bad
public boolean isFoo(); // ok
public boolean getFoo(boolean bar); // ok, unless checkParameterizedMethods=true
This rule has the following properties:
Name | Default Value | Description |
---|---|---|
checkParameterizedMethods | false | Check parameterized methods |
Use this rule with the default properties by just referencing it:
<rule ref="category/java/codestyle.xml/BooleanGetMethodName" />
Use this rule and customize it:
<rule ref="category/java/codestyle.xml/BooleanGetMethodName">
<properties>
<property name="checkParameterizedMethods" value="false" />
</properties>
</rule>
CallSuperInConstructor
Since: PMD 3.0
Priority: Medium (3)
It is a good practice to call super() in a constructor. If super() is not called but another constructor (such as an overloaded constructor) is called, this rule will not report it.
This rule is defined by the following XPath expression:
//ClassDeclaration[ExtendsList/*]
/ClassBody
/ConstructorDeclaration[ not(Block/ExplicitConstructorInvocation) ]
Example(s):
public class Foo extends Bar{
public Foo() {
// call the constructor of Bar
super();
}
public Foo(int code) {
// do something with code
this();
// no problem with this
}
}
Use this rule by referencing it:
<rule ref="category/java/codestyle.xml/CallSuperInConstructor" />
ClassNamingConventions
Since: PMD 1.2
Priority: High (1)
Configurable naming conventions for type declarations. This rule reports type declarations which do not match the regex that applies to their specific kind (e.g. enum or interface). Each regex can be configured through properties.
By default, this rule uses the standard Java naming convention (Pascal case).
The rule can detect utility classes and enforce a different naming convention
on those. E.g. setting the property utilityClassPattern
to
[A-Z][a-zA-Z0-9]+(Utils?|Helper|Constants)
reports any utility class, whose name
does not end in "Util(s)", "Helper" or "Constants".
For this rule, a utility class is defined as: a concrete class that does not inherit from a super class or implement any interface and only has static fields or methods.
This rule detects test classes using the following convention: Test classes are top-level classes, that either inherit from JUnit 3 TestCase or have at least one method annotated with the Test annotations from JUnit4/5 or TestNG.
This rule is defined by the following Java class: net.sourceforge.pmd.lang.java.rule.codestyle.ClassNamingConventionsRule
Example(s):
// This is Pascal case, the recommended naming convention in Java
// Note that the default values of this rule don't allow underscores
// or accented characters in type names
public class FooBar {}
// You may want abstract classes to be named 'AbstractXXX',
// in which case you can customize the regex for abstract
// classes to 'Abstract[A-Z]\w+'
public abstract class Thing {}
// This class doesn't respect the convention, and will be flagged
public class Éléphant {}
This rule has the following properties:
Name | Default Value | Description |
---|---|---|
classPattern | [A-Z][a-zA-Z0-9]* | Regex which applies to concrete class names |
abstractClassPattern | [A-Z][a-zA-Z0-9]* | Regex which applies to abstract class names |
interfacePattern | [A-Z][a-zA-Z0-9]* | Regex which applies to interface names |
enumPattern | [A-Z][a-zA-Z0-9]* | Regex which applies to enum names |
annotationPattern | [A-Z][a-zA-Z0-9]* | Regex which applies to annotation names |
utilityClassPattern | [A-Z][a-zA-Z0-9]* | Regex which applies to utility class names |
testClassPattern | ^Test.*$|^[A-Z][a-zA-Z0-9]*Test(s|Case)?$ | Regex which applies to test class names. Since PMD 6.52.0. |
Use this rule with the default properties by just referencing it:
<rule ref="category/java/codestyle.xml/ClassNamingConventions" />
Use this rule and customize it:
<rule ref="category/java/codestyle.xml/ClassNamingConventions">
<properties>
<property name="classPattern" value="[A-Z][a-zA-Z0-9]*" />
<property name="abstractClassPattern" value="[A-Z][a-zA-Z0-9]*" />
<property name="interfacePattern" value="[A-Z][a-zA-Z0-9]*" />
<property name="enumPattern" value="[A-Z][a-zA-Z0-9]*" />
<property name="annotationPattern" value="[A-Z][a-zA-Z0-9]*" />
<property name="utilityClassPattern" value="[A-Z][a-zA-Z0-9]*" />
<property name="testClassPattern" value="^Test.*$|^[A-Z][a-zA-Z0-9]*Test(s|Case)?$" />
</properties>
</rule>
CommentDefaultAccessModifier
Since: PMD 5.4.0
Priority: Medium (3)
To avoid mistakes if we want that an Annotation, Class, Enum, Method, Constructor or Field have a default access modifier
we must add a comment at the beginning of its declaration.
By default, the comment must be /* default */
or /* package */
, if you want another, you have to provide a regular expression.
This rule ignores by default all cases that have a @VisibleForTesting
annotation or any JUnit5/TestNG annotation. Use the
property "ignoredAnnotations" to customize the recognized annotations.
This rule is defined by the following Java class: net.sourceforge.pmd.lang.java.rule.codestyle.CommentDefaultAccessModifierRule
Example(s):
public class Foo {
final String stringValue = "some string";
String getString() {
return stringValue;
}
class NestedFoo {
}
}
// should be
public class Foo {
/* default */ final String stringValue = "some string";
/* default */ String getString() {
return stringValue;
}
/* default */ class NestedFoo {
}
}
This rule has the following properties:
Name | Default Value | Description |
---|---|---|
ignoredAnnotations | android.support.annotation.VisibleForTesting , co.elastic.clients.util.VisibleForTesting , com.google.common.annotations.VisibleForTesting , org.junit.jupiter.api.AfterAll , org.junit.jupiter.api.AfterEach , org.junit.jupiter.api.BeforeAll , org.junit.jupiter.api.BeforeEach , org.junit.jupiter.api.RepeatedTest , org.junit.jupiter.api.Test , org.junit.jupiter.api.TestFactory , org.junit.jupiter.api.TestTemplate , org.junit.jupiter.api.extension.RegisterExtension , org.junit.jupiter.params.ParameterizedTest , org.testng.annotations.AfterClass , org.testng.annotations.AfterGroups , org.testng.annotations.AfterMethod , org.testng.annotations.AfterSuite , org.testng.annotations.AfterTest , org.testng.annotations.BeforeClass , org.testng.annotations.BeforeGroups , org.testng.annotations.BeforeMethod , org.testng.annotations.BeforeSuite , org.testng.annotations.BeforeTest , org.testng.annotations.Test | Fully qualified names of the annotation types that should be ignored by this rule |
regex | \/\*\s*(default|package)\s*\*\/ | Regular expression |
checkTopLevelTypes | false | Check for default access modifier in top-level classes, annotations, and enums |
Use this rule with the default properties by just referencing it:
<rule ref="category/java/codestyle.xml/CommentDefaultAccessModifier" />
Use this rule and customize it:
<rule ref="category/java/codestyle.xml/CommentDefaultAccessModifier">
<properties>
<property name="ignoredAnnotations" value="android.support.annotation.VisibleForTesting,co.elastic.clients.util.VisibleForTesting,com.google.common.annotations.VisibleForTesting,org.junit.jupiter.api.AfterAll,org.junit.jupiter.api.AfterEach,org.junit.jupiter.api.BeforeAll,org.junit.jupiter.api.BeforeEach,org.junit.jupiter.api.RepeatedTest,org.junit.jupiter.api.Test,org.junit.jupiter.api.TestFactory,org.junit.jupiter.api.TestTemplate,org.junit.jupiter.api.extension.RegisterExtension,org.junit.jupiter.params.ParameterizedTest,org.testng.annotations.AfterClass,org.testng.annotations.AfterGroups,org.testng.annotations.AfterMethod,org.testng.annotations.AfterSuite,org.testng.annotations.AfterTest,org.testng.annotations.BeforeClass,org.testng.annotations.BeforeGroups,org.testng.annotations.BeforeMethod,org.testng.annotations.BeforeSuite,org.testng.annotations.BeforeTest,org.testng.annotations.Test" />
<property name="regex" value="\/\*\s*(default|package)\s*\*\/" />
<property name="checkTopLevelTypes" value="false" />
</properties>
</rule>
ConfusingTernary
Since: PMD 1.9
Priority: Medium (3)
Avoid negation within an "if" expression with an "else" clause. For example, rephrase:
if (x != y) diff(); else same();
as: if (x == y) same(); else diff();
.
Most "if (x != y)" cases without an "else" are often return cases, so consistent use of this rule makes the code easier to read. Also, this resolves trivial ordering problems, such as "does the error case go first?" or "does the common case go first?".
This rule is defined by the following Java class: net.sourceforge.pmd.lang.java.rule.codestyle.ConfusingTernaryRule
Example(s):
boolean bar(int x, int y) {
return (x != y) ? diff : same;
}
This rule has the following properties:
Name | Default Value | Description |
---|---|---|
ignoreElseIf | false | Ignore conditions with an else-if case |
Use this rule with the default properties by just referencing it:
<rule ref="category/java/codestyle.xml/ConfusingTernary" />
Use this rule and customize it:
<rule ref="category/java/codestyle.xml/ConfusingTernary">
<properties>
<property name="ignoreElseIf" value="false" />
</properties>
</rule>
ControlStatementBraces
Since: PMD 6.2.0
Priority: Medium (3)
Enforce a policy for braces on control statements. It is recommended to use braces on ‘if … else’ statements and loop statements, even if they are optional. This usually makes the code clearer, and helps prepare the future when you need to add another statement. That said, this rule lets you control which statements are required to have braces via properties.
From 6.2.0 on, this rule supersedes WhileLoopMustUseBraces, ForLoopMustUseBraces, IfStmtMustUseBraces, and IfElseStmtMustUseBraces.
This rule is defined by the following XPath expression:
//WhileStatement[$checkWhileStmt and not(Block) and not($allowEmptyLoop and EmptyStatement)]
|
//ForStatement[$checkForStmt and not(Block) and not($allowEmptyLoop and EmptyStatement)]
|
//ForeachStatement[$checkForStmt and not(Block) and not($allowEmptyLoop and EmptyStatement)]
|
//DoStatement[$checkDoWhileStmt and not(Block) and not($allowEmptyLoop and EmptyStatement)]
|
(: The violation is reported on the sub statement -- not the if statement :)
//IfStatement[$checkIfElseStmt]
/*[position() > 1 and not(self::Block or self::IfStatement)]
[ $checkSingleIfStmt
(: Inside this (...) is the definition of a "single if statement" :)
or not(parent::*/@Else = false() (: No else stmt :)
(: Not the last branch of an 'if ... else if' chain :)
and not(parent::IfStatement[parent::IfStatement]))]
|
(: Reports case labels if one of their subordinate statements is not braced :)
//SwitchFallthroughBranch[$checkCaseStmt]
[count(*) > 1 and (count(*) > 2 or not(child::*[2]/self::Block))]
Example(s):
while (true) // not recommended
x++;
while (true) { // preferred approach
x++;
}
This rule has the following properties:
Name | Default Value | Description |
---|---|---|
checkIfElseStmt | true | Require that ‘if … else’ statements use braces |
checkSingleIfStmt | true | Require that ‘if’ statements with a single branch use braces |
checkWhileStmt | true | Require that ‘while’ loops use braces |
checkForStmt | true | Require that ‘for’ loops should use braces |
checkDoWhileStmt | true | Require that ‘do … while’ loops use braces |
checkCaseStmt | false | Require that cases of a switch have braces |
allowEmptyLoop | false | Allow loops with an empty statement, e.g. ‘while(true);’ |
Use this rule with the default properties by just referencing it:
<rule ref="category/java/codestyle.xml/ControlStatementBraces" />
Use this rule and customize it:
<rule ref="category/java/codestyle.xml/ControlStatementBraces">
<properties>
<property name="checkIfElseStmt" value="true" />
<property name="checkSingleIfStmt" value="true" />
<property name="checkWhileStmt" value="true" />
<property name="checkForStmt" value="true" />
<property name="checkDoWhileStmt" value="true" />
<property name="checkCaseStmt" value="false" />
<property name="allowEmptyLoop" value="false" />
</properties>
</rule>
EmptyControlStatement
Since: PMD 6.46.0
Priority: Medium (3)
Reports control statements whose body is empty, as well as empty initializers.
The checked code constructs are the following:
- bodies of
try
statements finally
clauses oftry
statementsswitch
statementssynchronized
statementsif
statements- loop statements:
while
,for
,do .. while
- initializers
- blocks used as statements (for scoping)
This rule replaces the rules EmptyFinallyBlock, EmptyIfStmt, EmptyInitializer, EmptyStatementBlock, EmptySwitchStatements, EmptySynchronizedBlock, EmptyTryBlock, and EmptyWhileStmt.
Notice that EmptyCatchBlock
is still an independent rule.
EmptyStatementNotInLoop is replaced by UnnecessarySemicolon
.
This rule is defined by the following Java class: net.sourceforge.pmd.lang.java.rule.codestyle.EmptyControlStatementRule
Example(s):
class Foo {
{
if (true); // empty if statement
if (true) { // empty as well
}
}
{} // empty initializer
}
This rule has the following properties:
Name | Default Value | Description |
---|---|---|
allowCommentedBlocks | false | Option for allowing empty but commented blocks. This is useful where a developer wants to have the code structure and explain why a condition does not require logic or to hold TODO comments for future work. |
Use this rule with the default properties by just referencing it:
<rule ref="category/java/codestyle.xml/EmptyControlStatement" />
Use this rule and customize it:
<rule ref="category/java/codestyle.xml/EmptyControlStatement">
<properties>
<property name="allowCommentedBlocks" value="false" />
</properties>
</rule>
EmptyMethodInAbstractClassShouldBeAbstract
Since: PMD 4.1
Priority: High (1)
Empty or auto-generated methods in an abstract class should be tagged as abstract. This helps to remove their inapproprate usage by developers who should be implementing their own versions in the concrete subclasses.
This rule is defined by the following XPath expression:
//ClassDeclaration[@RegularClass = true() and pmd-java:modifiers() = "abstract"]
/ClassBody
/MethodDeclaration
[Block[
let $size := count(*[not(self::EmptyStatement)])
return $size = 0
or $size = 1 and ReturnStatement[ NullLiteral or NumericLiteral[@ValueAsInt = 0] or StringLiteral[@Empty = true()]]
]]
Example(s):
public abstract class ShouldBeAbstract {
public Object couldBeAbstract() {
// Should be abstract method ?
return null;
}
public void couldBeAbstract() {
}
}
Use this rule by referencing it:
<rule ref="category/java/codestyle.xml/EmptyMethodInAbstractClassShouldBeAbstract" />
ExtendsObject
Since: PMD 5.0
Priority: Medium Low (4)
No need to explicitly extend Object.
This rule is defined by the following XPath expression:
//ExtendsList/ClassType[pmd-java:typeIsExactly('java.lang.Object')]
Example(s):
public class Foo extends Object { // not required
}
Use this rule by referencing it:
<rule ref="category/java/codestyle.xml/ExtendsObject" />
FieldDeclarationsShouldBeAtStartOfClass
Since: PMD 5.0
Priority: Medium (3)
Fields should be declared at the top of the class, before any method declarations, constructors, initializers or inner classes.
This rule is defined by the following Java class: net.sourceforge.pmd.lang.java.rule.codestyle.FieldDeclarationsShouldBeAtStartOfClassRule
Example(s):
public class HelloWorldBean {
// Field declared before methods / inner classes - OK
private String _thing;
public String getMessage() {
return "Hello World!";
}
// Field declared after methods / inner classes - avoid this
private String _fieldInWrongLocation;
}
This rule has the following properties:
Name | Default Value | Description |
---|---|---|
ignoreAnonymousClassDeclarations | true | Ignore field declarations, that are initialized with an anonymous class creation expression |
ignoreInterfaceDeclarations | false | Ignore interface declarations that precede fields |
ignoreEnumDeclarations | true | Ignore enum declarations that precede fields |
Use this rule with the default properties by just referencing it:
<rule ref="category/java/codestyle.xml/FieldDeclarationsShouldBeAtStartOfClass" />
Use this rule and customize it:
<rule ref="category/java/codestyle.xml/FieldDeclarationsShouldBeAtStartOfClass">
<properties>
<property name="ignoreAnonymousClassDeclarations" value="true" />
<property name="ignoreInterfaceDeclarations" value="false" />
<property name="ignoreEnumDeclarations" value="true" />
</properties>
</rule>
FieldNamingConventions
Since: PMD 6.7.0
Priority: High (1)
Configurable naming conventions for field declarations. This rule reports variable declarations which do not match the regex that applies to their specific kind —e.g. constants (static final), enum constant, final field. Each regex can be configured through properties.
By default this rule uses the standard Java naming convention (Camel case), and uses the ALL_UPPER convention for constants and enum constants.
This rule is defined by the following Java class: net.sourceforge.pmd.lang.java.rule.codestyle.FieldNamingConventionsRule
Example(s):
class Foo {
int myField = 1; // This is in camel case, so it's ok
int my_Field = 1; // This contains an underscore, it's not ok by default
// but you may allow it, or even require the "my_" prefix
final int FinalField = 1; // you may configure a different convention for final fields,
// e.g. here PascalCase: [A-Z][a-zA-Z0-9]*
interface Interface {
double PI = 3.14; // interface "fields" use the constantPattern property
}
enum AnEnum {
ORG, NET, COM; // These use a separate property but are set to ALL_UPPER by default
}
}
This rule has the following properties:
Name | Default Value | Description |
---|---|---|
publicConstantPattern | [A-Z][A-Z_0-9]* | Regex which applies to public constant names |
constantPattern | [A-Z][A-Z_0-9]* | Regex which applies to non-public static final field names |
enumConstantPattern | [A-Z][A-Z_0-9]* | Regex which applies to enum constant names |
finalFieldPattern | [a-z][a-zA-Z0-9]* | Regex which applies to final field names |
staticFieldPattern | [a-z][a-zA-Z0-9]* | Regex which applies to static field names |
defaultFieldPattern | [a-z][a-zA-Z0-9]* | Regex which applies to field names |
exclusions | serialVersionUID , serialPersistentFields | Names of fields to whitelist. |
Use this rule with the default properties by just referencing it:
<rule ref="category/java/codestyle.xml/FieldNamingConventions" />
Use this rule and customize it:
<rule ref="category/java/codestyle.xml/FieldNamingConventions">
<properties>
<property name="publicConstantPattern" value="[A-Z][A-Z_0-9]*" />
<property name="constantPattern" value="[A-Z][A-Z_0-9]*" />
<property name="enumConstantPattern" value="[A-Z][A-Z_0-9]*" />
<property name="finalFieldPattern" value="[a-z][a-zA-Z0-9]*" />
<property name="staticFieldPattern" value="[a-z][a-zA-Z0-9]*" />
<property name="defaultFieldPattern" value="[a-z][a-zA-Z0-9]*" />
<property name="exclusions" value="serialVersionUID,serialPersistentFields" />
</properties>
</rule>
FinalParameterInAbstractMethod
Since: PMD 6.42.0
Priority: High (1)
Declaring a method parameter as final for an interface method is useless because the implementation may choose to not respect it.
This rule is defined by the following XPath expression:
//MethodDeclaration
[FormalParameters/FormalParameter[@Final = true()]]
[not(Block)]
Example(s):
public interface MyInterface {
void process(final Object arg); // Avoid using final here
}
Use this rule by referencing it:
<rule ref="category/java/codestyle.xml/FinalParameterInAbstractMethod" />
ForLoopShouldBeWhileLoop
Since: PMD 1.02
Priority: Medium (3)
Some for loops can be simplified to while loops, this makes them more concise.
This rule is defined by the following XPath expression:
//ForStatement[not(ForInit | ForUpdate) and count(*) = 2]
Example(s):
public class Foo {
void bar() {
for (;true;) true; // No Init or Update part, may as well be: while (true)
}
}
Use this rule by referencing it:
<rule ref="category/java/codestyle.xml/ForLoopShouldBeWhileLoop" />
FormalParameterNamingConventions
Since: PMD 6.6.0
Priority: High (1)
Configurable naming conventions for formal parameters of methods and lambdas. This rule reports formal parameters which do not match the regex that applies to their specific kind (e.g. lambda parameter, or final formal parameter). Each regex can be configured through properties.
By default this rule uses the standard Java naming convention (Camel case).
This rule is defined by the following Java class: net.sourceforge.pmd.lang.java.rule.codestyle.FormalParameterNamingConventionsRule
Example(s):
class Foo {
abstract void bar(int myInt); // This is Camel case, so it's ok
void bar(int my_i) { // this will be reported
}
void lambdas() {
// lambdas parameters can be configured separately
Consumer<String> lambda1 = s_str -> { };
// lambda parameters with an explicit type can be configured separately
Consumer<String> lambda1 = (String str) -> { };
}
}
This rule has the following properties:
Name | Default Value | Description |
---|---|---|
methodParameterPattern | [a-z][a-zA-Z0-9]* | Regex which applies to formal parameter names |
finalMethodParameterPattern | [a-z][a-zA-Z0-9]* | Regex which applies to final formal parameter names |
lambdaParameterPattern | [a-z][a-zA-Z0-9]* | Regex which applies to inferred-type lambda parameter names |
explicitLambdaParameterPattern | [a-z][a-zA-Z0-9]* | Regex which applies to explicitly-typed lambda parameter names |
Use this rule with the default properties by just referencing it:
<rule ref="category/java/codestyle.xml/FormalParameterNamingConventions" />
Use this rule and customize it:
<rule ref="category/java/codestyle.xml/FormalParameterNamingConventions">
<properties>
<property name="methodParameterPattern" value="[a-z][a-zA-Z0-9]*" />
<property name="finalMethodParameterPattern" value="[a-z][a-zA-Z0-9]*" />
<property name="lambdaParameterPattern" value="[a-z][a-zA-Z0-9]*" />
<property name="explicitLambdaParameterPattern" value="[a-z][a-zA-Z0-9]*" />
</properties>
</rule>
GenericsNaming
Since: PMD 4.2.6
Priority: Medium Low (4)
Names for references to generic values should be limited to a single uppercase letter.
This rule is defined by the following XPath expression:
//TypeParameter[
string-length(@Name) > 1
or
upper-case(@Name) != @Name
]
Example(s):
public interface GenericDao<E extends BaseModel, K extends Serializable> extends BaseDao {
// This is ok...
}
public interface GenericDao<E extends BaseModel, K extends Serializable> {
// Also this
}
public interface GenericDao<e extends BaseModel, K extends Serializable> {
// 'e' should be an 'E'
}
public interface GenericDao<EF extends BaseModel, K extends Serializable> {
// 'EF' is not ok.
}
Use this rule by referencing it:
<rule ref="category/java/codestyle.xml/GenericsNaming" />
IdenticalCatchBranches
Since: PMD 6.4.0
Priority: Medium (3)
Minimum Language Version: Java 1.7
Identical catch
branches use up vertical space and increase the complexity of code without
adding functionality. It’s better style to collapse identical branches into a single multi-catch
branch.
This rule is defined by the following Java class: net.sourceforge.pmd.lang.java.rule.codestyle.IdenticalCatchBranchesRule
Example(s):
try {
// do something
} catch (IllegalArgumentException e) {
throw e;
} catch (IllegalStateException e) { // Can be collapsed into the previous block
throw e;
}
try {
// do something
} catch (IllegalArgumentException | IllegalStateException e) { // This is better
throw e;
}
Use this rule by referencing it:
<rule ref="category/java/codestyle.xml/IdenticalCatchBranches" />
LambdaCanBeMethodReference
Since: PMD 7.1.0
Priority: Medium (3)
This rule reports lambda expressions that can be written more succinctly as a method reference. This is the case if the lambda is an expression lambda that only calls one method, passing the entire lambda parameter list in order to the method. For instance:
x -> Foo.call(x) // can be Foo::call
x -> call(x) // can be this::call, if call is an instance method
(x, y, z) -> call(x, y, z) // can be this::call
() -> foo.get() // can be foo::get
x -> x.foo() // can be XType::foo (where XType is the type of x)
In some cases rewriting a lambda to a method reference can change the semantics of the code. For instance in (x) -> someVar.call(x)
, the invocation of the lambda may produce a NullPointerException (NPE) if someVar
is null. The method reference someVar::call
will also NPE if someVar
is null, but it will do so at the point the method reference is created, while the lambda is created without error and its NPE is only thrown if the lambda is invoked (which may be never). Code should probably not rely on this subtle semantic difference, therefore these potentially problematic lambdas are also reported by default. This behavior can be disabled by setting the property ignoreIfMayNPE
to true
.
The property ignoreIfMayNPE
is true by default. By default, calls whose receiver is itself a method call are ignored, because they could cause side effects. This may be changed by setting the property ignoreIfReceiverIsMethod
to false
.
Scope limitations:
- This rule will not report lambdas of the form
x -> new CtorCall().something(x)
, because the semantics of the method reference would be to create a single new object, while the lambda creates one object per invocation. - The rule cannot know if the qualifier of a method call performs side effects. This means
(x) -> sideEffectingMethod().foo(x)
will be reported. Suppress the warning in this case.
This rule is defined by the following Java class: net.sourceforge.pmd.lang.java.rule.codestyle.LambdaCanBeMethodReferenceRule
Example(s):
import java.util.stream.Stream;
public class LambdaCanBeMethodReference {
static {
Stream.of("abc", "d")
.mapToInt(s -> s.length()) // could be String::length
.reduce((x, y) -> Integer.sum(x, y)) // could be Integer::sum
.getAsInt();
}
}
This rule has the following properties:
Name | Default Value | Description |
---|---|---|
ignoreIfMayNPE | false | Ignore lambdas that may throw a null pointer exception (NPE) when converted to a method reference. Those expressions will NPE at mref creation time, while the equivalent lambda would NPE only when invoked (which may be never). |
ignoreIfReceiverIsMethod | true | Ignore if the receiver of the method reference is a method call. These may cause side effects that often should prevent the conversion to a method reference. |
Use this rule with the default properties by just referencing it:
<rule ref="category/java/codestyle.xml/LambdaCanBeMethodReference" />
Use this rule and customize it:
<rule ref="category/java/codestyle.xml/LambdaCanBeMethodReference">
<properties>
<property name="ignoreIfMayNPE" value="false" />
<property name="ignoreIfReceiverIsMethod" value="true" />
</properties>
</rule>
LinguisticNaming
Since: PMD 6.7.0
Priority: Medium (3)
This rule finds Linguistic Naming Antipatterns. It checks for fields, that are named, as if they should be boolean but have a different type. It also checks for methods, that according to their name, should return a boolean, but don’t. Further, it checks, that getters return something and setters won’t. Finally, it checks that methods, that start with "to" - so called transform methods - actually return something, since according to their name, they should convert or transform one object into another. There is additionally an option, to check for methods that contain "To" in their name - which are also transform methods. However, this is disabled by default, since this detection is prone to false positives.
For more information, see Linguistic Antipatterns - What They Are and How Developers Perceive Them.
This rule is defined by the following Java class: net.sourceforge.pmd.lang.java.rule.codestyle.LinguisticNamingRule
Example(s):
public class LinguisticNaming {
int isValid; // the field name indicates a boolean, but it is an int.
boolean isTrue; // correct type of the field
void myMethod() {
int hasMoneyLocal; // the local variable name indicates a boolean, but it is an int.
boolean hasSalaryLocal; // correct naming and type
}
// the name of the method indicates, it is a boolean, but the method returns an int.
int isValid() {
return 1;
}
// correct naming and return type
boolean isSmall() {
return true;
}
// the name indicates, this is a setter, but it returns something
int setName() {
return 1;
}
// the name indicates, this is a getter, but it doesn't return anything
void getName() {
// nothing to return?
}
// the name indicates, it transforms an object and should return the result
void toDataType() {
// nothing to return?
}
// the name indicates, it transforms an object and should return the result
void grapeToWine() {
// nothing to return?
}
}
This rule has the following properties:
Name | Default Value | Description |
---|---|---|
ignoredAnnotations | java.lang.Override | Fully qualified names of the annotation types that should be ignored by this rule |
checkBooleanMethod | true | Check method names and types for inconsistent naming. |
checkGetters | true | Check return type of getters. |
checkSetters | true | Check return type of setters. |
checkPrefixedTransformMethods | true | Check return type of methods whose names start with the configured prefix (see transformMethodNames property). |
checkTransformMethods | false | Check return type of methods which contain the configured infix in their name (see transformMethodNames property). |
booleanMethodPrefixes | is , has , can , have , will , should | The prefixes of methods that return boolean. |
transformMethodNames | to , as | The prefixes and infixes that indicate a transform method. |
checkFields | true | Check field names and types for inconsistent naming. |
checkVariables | true | Check local variable names and types for inconsistent naming. |
booleanFieldPrefixes | is , has , can , have , will , should | The prefixes of fields and variables that indicate boolean. |
Use this rule with the default properties by just referencing it:
<rule ref="category/java/codestyle.xml/LinguisticNaming" />
Use this rule and customize it:
<rule ref="category/java/codestyle.xml/LinguisticNaming">
<properties>
<property name="ignoredAnnotations" value="java.lang.Override" />
<property name="checkBooleanMethod" value="true" />
<property name="checkGetters" value="true" />
<property name="checkSetters" value="true" />
<property name="checkPrefixedTransformMethods" value="true" />
<property name="checkTransformMethods" value="false" />
<property name="booleanMethodPrefixes" value="is,has,can,have,will,should" />
<property name="transformMethodNames" value="to,as" />
<property name="checkFields" value="true" />
<property name="checkVariables" value="true" />
<property name="booleanFieldPrefixes" value="is,has,can,have,will,should" />
</properties>
</rule>
LocalHomeNamingConvention
Since: PMD 4.0
Priority: Medium Low (4)
The Local Home interface of a Session EJB should be suffixed by ‘LocalHome’.
This rule is defined by the following XPath expression:
//ClassDeclaration
[
pmd-java:typeIs('javax.ejb.EJBLocalHome')
and not(ends-with(@SimpleName, 'LocalHome'))
]
Example(s):
public interface MyBeautifulLocalHome extends javax.ejb.EJBLocalHome {} // proper name
public interface MissingProperSuffix extends javax.ejb.EJBLocalHome {} // non-standard name
Use this rule by referencing it:
<rule ref="category/java/codestyle.xml/LocalHomeNamingConvention" />
LocalInterfaceSessionNamingConvention
Since: PMD 4.0
Priority: Medium Low (4)
The Local Interface of a Session EJB should be suffixed by ‘Local’.
This rule is defined by the following XPath expression:
//ClassDeclaration
[
pmd-java:typeIs('javax.ejb.EJBLocalObject')
and not(ends-with(@SimpleName, 'Local'))
]
Example(s):
public interface MyLocal extends javax.ejb.EJBLocalObject {} // proper name
public interface MissingProperSuffix extends javax.ejb.EJBLocalObject {} // non-standard name
Use this rule by referencing it:
<rule ref="category/java/codestyle.xml/LocalInterfaceSessionNamingConvention" />
LocalVariableCouldBeFinal
Since: PMD 2.2
Priority: Medium (3)
A local variable assigned only once can be declared final.
This rule is defined by the following Java class: net.sourceforge.pmd.lang.java.rule.codestyle.LocalVariableCouldBeFinalRule
Example(s):
public class Bar {
public void foo () {
String txtA = "a"; // if txtA will not be assigned again it is better to do this:
final String txtB = "b";
}
}
This rule has the following properties:
Name | Default Value | Description |
---|---|---|
ignoreForEachDecl | false | Ignore non-final loop variables in a for-each statement. |
Use this rule with the default properties by just referencing it:
<rule ref="category/java/codestyle.xml/LocalVariableCouldBeFinal" />
Use this rule and customize it:
<rule ref="category/java/codestyle.xml/LocalVariableCouldBeFinal">
<properties>
<property name="ignoreForEachDecl" value="false" />
</properties>
</rule>
LocalVariableNamingConventions
Since: PMD 6.6.0
Priority: High (1)
Configurable naming conventions for local variable declarations and other locally-scoped variables. This rule reports variable declarations which do not match the regex that applies to their specific kind (e.g. final variable, or catch-clause parameter). Each regex can be configured through properties.
By default this rule uses the standard Java naming convention (Camel case).
This rule is defined by the following Java class: net.sourceforge.pmd.lang.java.rule.codestyle.LocalVariableNamingConventionsRule
Example(s):
class Foo {
void bar() {
int localVariable = 1; // This is in camel case, so it's ok
int local_variable = 1; // This will be reported unless you change the regex
final int i_var = 1; // final local variables can be configured separately
try {
foo();
} catch (IllegalArgumentException e_illegal) {
// exception block parameters can be configured separately
}
}
}
This rule has the following properties:
Name | Default Value | Description |
---|---|---|
localVarPattern | [a-z][a-zA-Z0-9]* | Regex which applies to non-final local variable names |
finalVarPattern | [a-z][a-zA-Z0-9]* | Regex which applies to final local variable names |
catchParameterPattern | [a-z][a-zA-Z0-9]* | Regex which applies to exception block parameter names |
Use this rule with the default properties by just referencing it:
<rule ref="category/java/codestyle.xml/LocalVariableNamingConventions" />
Use this rule and customize it:
<rule ref="category/java/codestyle.xml/LocalVariableNamingConventions">
<properties>
<property name="localVarPattern" value="[a-z][a-zA-Z0-9]*" />
<property name="finalVarPattern" value="[a-z][a-zA-Z0-9]*" />
<property name="catchParameterPattern" value="[a-z][a-zA-Z0-9]*" />
</properties>
</rule>
LongVariable
Since: PMD 0.3
Priority: Medium (3)
Fields, formal arguments, or local variable names that are too long can make the code difficult to follow.
This rule is defined by the following XPath expression:
//VariableId[string-length(@Name) > $minimum]
Example(s):
public class Something {
int reallyLongIntName = -3; // VIOLATION - Field
public static void main( String argumentsList[] ) { // VIOLATION - Formal
int otherReallyLongName = -5; // VIOLATION - Local
for (int interestingIntIndex = 0; // VIOLATION - For
interestingIntIndex < 10;
interestingIntIndex ++ ) {
}
}
This rule has the following properties:
Name | Default Value | Description |
---|---|---|
minimum | 17 | The variable length reporting threshold |
Use this rule with the default properties by just referencing it:
<rule ref="category/java/codestyle.xml/LongVariable" />
Use this rule and customize it:
<rule ref="category/java/codestyle.xml/LongVariable">
<properties>
<property name="minimum" value="17" />
</properties>
</rule>
MDBAndSessionBeanNamingConvention
Since: PMD 4.0
Priority: Medium Low (4)
The EJB Specification states that any MessageDrivenBean or SessionBean should be suffixed by ‘Bean’.
This rule is defined by the following XPath expression:
//ClassDeclaration
[
(pmd-java:typeIs('javax.ejb.SessionBean')
or pmd-java:typeIs('javax.ejb.MessageDrivenBean'))
and not(ends-with(@SimpleName, 'Bean'))
]
Example(s):
public class SomeBean implements SessionBean{} // proper name
public class MissingTheProperSuffix implements SessionBean {} // non-standard name
Use this rule by referencing it:
<rule ref="category/java/codestyle.xml/MDBAndSessionBeanNamingConvention" />
MethodArgumentCouldBeFinal
Since: PMD 2.2
Priority: Medium (3)
Reports method and constructor parameters that can be made final because they are never reassigned within the body of the method.
This rule ignores unused parameters so as not to overlap with the rule UnusedFormalParameter
.
It will also ignore the parameters of abstract methods.
This rule is defined by the following Java class: net.sourceforge.pmd.lang.java.rule.codestyle.MethodArgumentCouldBeFinalRule
Example(s):
class Foo {
// reported, parameter can be declared final
public String foo1(String param) {
return param;
}
// not reported, parameter is declared final
public String foo2(final String param) {
return param.trim();
}
// not reported because param is unused
public String unusedParam(String param) {
return "abc";
}
}
Use this rule by referencing it:
<rule ref="category/java/codestyle.xml/MethodArgumentCouldBeFinal" />
MethodNamingConventions
Since: PMD 1.2
Priority: High (1)
Configurable naming conventions for method declarations. This rule reports method declarations which do not match the regex that applies to their specific kind (e.g. JUnit test or native method). Each regex can be configured through properties.
By default this rule uses the standard Java naming convention (Camel case).
This rule is defined by the following Java class: net.sourceforge.pmd.lang.java.rule.codestyle.MethodNamingConventionsRule
Example(s):
public class Foo {
public void fooStuff() {
}
}
This rule has the following properties:
Name | Default Value | Description |
---|---|---|
methodPattern | [a-z][a-zA-Z0-9]* | Regex which applies to instance method names |
staticPattern | [a-z][a-zA-Z0-9]* | Regex which applies to static method names |
nativePattern | [a-z][a-zA-Z0-9]* | Regex which applies to native method names |
junit3TestPattern | test[A-Z0-9][a-zA-Z0-9]* | Regex which applies to JUnit 3 test method names |
junit4TestPattern | [a-z][a-zA-Z0-9]* | Regex which applies to JUnit 4 test method names |
junit5TestPattern | [a-z][a-zA-Z0-9]* | Regex which applies to JUnit 5 test method names |
Use this rule with the default properties by just referencing it:
<rule ref="category/java/codestyle.xml/MethodNamingConventions" />
Use this rule and customize it:
<rule ref="category/java/codestyle.xml/MethodNamingConventions">
<properties>
<property name="methodPattern" value="[a-z][a-zA-Z0-9]*" />
<property name="staticPattern" value="[a-z][a-zA-Z0-9]*" />
<property name="nativePattern" value="[a-z][a-zA-Z0-9]*" />
<property name="junit3TestPattern" value="test[A-Z0-9][a-zA-Z0-9]*" />
<property name="junit4TestPattern" value="[a-z][a-zA-Z0-9]*" />
<property name="junit5TestPattern" value="[a-z][a-zA-Z0-9]*" />
</properties>
</rule>
NoPackage
Since: PMD 3.3
Priority: Medium (3)
Detects when a class, interface, enum or annotation does not have a package definition.
This rule is defined by the following XPath expression:
/CompilationUnit[not(PackageDeclaration)]/*[pmd-java:nodeIs("TypeDeclaration")][1]
Example(s):
// no package declaration
public class ClassInDefaultPackage {
}
Use this rule by referencing it:
<rule ref="category/java/codestyle.xml/NoPackage" />
OnlyOneReturn
Since: PMD 1.0
Priority: Medium (3)
A method should have only one exit point, and that should be the last statement in the method.
This rule is defined by the following Java class: net.sourceforge.pmd.lang.java.rule.codestyle.OnlyOneReturnRule
Example(s):
public class OneReturnOnly1 {
public String foo(int x) {
if (x > 0) {
return "hey"; // first exit
}
return "hi"; // second exit
}
}
Use this rule by referencing it:
<rule ref="category/java/codestyle.xml/OnlyOneReturn" />
PackageCase
Since: PMD 3.3
Priority: Medium (3)
Detects when a package definition contains uppercase characters.
This rule is defined by the following XPath expression:
//PackageDeclaration[lower-case(@Name) != @Name]
Example(s):
package com.MyCompany; // should be lowercase name
public class SomeClass {
}
Use this rule by referencing it:
<rule ref="category/java/codestyle.xml/PackageCase" />
PrematureDeclaration
Since: PMD 5.0
Priority: Medium (3)
Checks for variables that are defined before they might be used. A declaration is deemed to be premature if there are some statements that may return or throw an exception between the time the variable is declared and the time it is first read.
Some variables cannot be declared close to their first usage because of side-effects occurring before they’re first used. We try to avoid reporting those by considering most method and constructor invocations to be impure. See the second example.
Note that this rule is meant to improve code readability but is not an optimization. A smart JIT will not care whether the variable is declared prematurely or not, as it can reorder code.
This rule is defined by the following Java class: net.sourceforge.pmd.lang.java.rule.codestyle.PrematureDeclarationRule
Example(s):
public int getLength(String[] strings) {
int length = 0; // could be moved closer to the loop
if (strings == null || strings.length == 0) return 0;
for (String str : strings) {
length += str.length();
}
return length;
}
public int getLength(String[] strings) {
int startTime = System.nanoTime(); // cannot be moved because initializer is impure
if (strings == null || strings.length == 0) {
// some error logic
throw new SomeException(...);
}
for (String str : strings) {
length += str.length();
}
return System.nanoTime() - startTime;
}
Use this rule by referencing it:
<rule ref="category/java/codestyle.xml/PrematureDeclaration" />
RemoteInterfaceNamingConvention
Since: PMD 4.0
Priority: Medium Low (4)
Remote Interface of a Session EJB should not have a suffix.
This rule is defined by the following XPath expression:
//ClassDeclaration
[
pmd-java:typeIs('javax.ejb.EJBObject')
and matches(@SimpleName, '.*(Session|EJB|Bean)$')
]
Example(s):
/* Poor Session suffix */
public interface BadSuffixSession extends javax.ejb.EJBObject {}
/* Poor EJB suffix */
public interface BadSuffixEJB extends javax.ejb.EJBObject {}
/* Poor Bean suffix */
public interface BadSuffixBean extends javax.ejb.EJBObject {}
Use this rule by referencing it:
<rule ref="category/java/codestyle.xml/RemoteInterfaceNamingConvention" />
RemoteSessionInterfaceNamingConvention
Since: PMD 4.0
Priority: Medium Low (4)
A Remote Home interface type of a Session EJB should be suffixed by ‘Home’.
This rule is defined by the following XPath expression:
//ClassDeclaration
[
pmd-java:typeIs('javax.ejb.EJBHome')
and not(ends-with(@SimpleName, 'Home'))
]
Example(s):
public interface MyBeautifulHome extends javax.ejb.EJBHome {} // proper name
public interface MissingProperSuffix extends javax.ejb.EJBHome {} // non-standard name
Use this rule by referencing it:
<rule ref="category/java/codestyle.xml/RemoteSessionInterfaceNamingConvention" />
ShortClassName
Since: PMD 5.0
Priority: Medium Low (4)
Short Classnames with fewer than e.g. five characters are not recommended.
This rule is defined by the following XPath expression:
//ClassDeclaration[string-length(@SimpleName) < $minimum]
Example(s):
public class Foo {
}
This rule has the following properties:
Name | Default Value | Description |
---|---|---|
minimum | 5 | Number of characters that are required as a minimum for a class name. |
Use this rule with the default properties by just referencing it:
<rule ref="category/java/codestyle.xml/ShortClassName" />
Use this rule and customize it:
<rule ref="category/java/codestyle.xml/ShortClassName">
<properties>
<property name="minimum" value="5" />
</properties>
</rule>
ShortMethodName
Since: PMD 0.3
Priority: Medium (3)
Method names that are very short are not helpful to the reader.
This rule is defined by the following XPath expression:
//MethodDeclaration[string-length(@Name) < $minimum]
Example(s):
public class ShortMethod {
public void a( int i ) { // Violation
}
}
This rule has the following properties:
Name | Default Value | Description |
---|---|---|
minimum | 3 | Number of characters that are required as a minimum for a method name. |
Use this rule with the default properties by just referencing it:
<rule ref="category/java/codestyle.xml/ShortMethodName" />
Use this rule and customize it:
<rule ref="category/java/codestyle.xml/ShortMethodName">
<properties>
<property name="minimum" value="3" />
</properties>
</rule>
ShortVariable
Since: PMD 0.3
Priority: Medium (3)
Fields, local variables, enum constant names or parameter names that are very short are not helpful to the reader.
This rule is defined by the following XPath expression:
//VariableId[string-length(@Name) < $minimum]
(: ForStatement :)
[not(../../parent::ForInit)]
(: Foreach statement :)
[not(../../parent::ForeachStatement)]
(: Catch statement parameter :)
[not(parent::CatchParameter)]
(: Lambda expression parameter :)
[not(parent::LambdaParameter)]
Example(s):
public class Something {
private int q = 15; // field - too short
public static void main( String as[] ) { // formal arg - too short
int r = 20 + q; // local var - too short
for (int i = 0; i < 10; i++) { // not a violation (inside 'for' loop)
r += q;
}
for (Integer i : numbers) { // not a violation (inside 'for-each' loop)
r += q;
}
}
}
This rule has the following properties:
Name | Default Value | Description |
---|---|---|
minimum | 3 | Number of characters that are required as a minimum for a variable name. |
Use this rule with the default properties by just referencing it:
<rule ref="category/java/codestyle.xml/ShortVariable" />
Use this rule and customize it:
<rule ref="category/java/codestyle.xml/ShortVariable">
<properties>
<property name="minimum" value="3" />
</properties>
</rule>
TooManyStaticImports
Since: PMD 4.1
Priority: Medium (3)
If you overuse the static import feature, it can make your program unreadable and unmaintainable, polluting its namespace with all the static members you import. Readers of your code (including you, a few months after you wrote it) will not know which class a static member comes from (Sun 1.5 Language Guide).
This rule is defined by the following XPath expression:
.[count(ImportDeclaration[@Static = true()]) > $maximumStaticImports]
Example(s):
import static Lennon;
import static Ringo;
import static George;
import static Paul;
import static Yoko; // Too much !
This rule has the following properties:
Name | Default Value | Description |
---|---|---|
maximumStaticImports | 4 | All static imports can be disallowed by setting this to 0 |
Use this rule with the default properties by just referencing it:
<rule ref="category/java/codestyle.xml/TooManyStaticImports" />
Use this rule and customize it:
<rule ref="category/java/codestyle.xml/TooManyStaticImports">
<properties>
<property name="maximumStaticImports" value="4" />
</properties>
</rule>
UnnecessaryAnnotationValueElement
Since: PMD 6.2.0
Priority: Medium (3)
Avoid the use of value in annotations when it’s the only element.
This rule is defined by the following XPath expression:
//Annotation/AnnotationMemberList[count(*) = 1 and MemberValuePair[@Shorthand = false() and @Name = 'value']]
Example(s):
@TestClassAnnotation(value = "TEST")
public class Foo {
@TestMemberAnnotation(value = "TEST")
private String y;
@TestMethodAnnotation(value = "TEST")
public void bar() {
int x = 42;
return;
}
}
// should be
@TestClassAnnotation("TEST")
public class Foo {
@TestMemberAnnotation("TEST")
private String y;
@TestMethodAnnotation("TEST")
public void bar() {
int x = 42;
return;
}
}
This rule has the following properties:
Name | Default Value | Description |
---|---|---|
java7Compatibility | false | If disabled, the rule shows also violations that are applicable for java8+ |
Use this rule with the default properties by just referencing it:
<rule ref="category/java/codestyle.xml/UnnecessaryAnnotationValueElement" />
Use this rule and customize it:
<rule ref="category/java/codestyle.xml/UnnecessaryAnnotationValueElement">
<properties>
<property name="java7Compatibility" value="false" />
</properties>
</rule>
UnnecessaryBoxing
Since: PMD 7.0.0
Priority: Medium (3)
Minimum Language Version: Java 1.5
Reports explicit boxing and unboxing conversions that may safely be removed, either because they would be inserted by the compiler automatically, or because they’re semantically a noop (eg unboxing a value to rebox it immediately).
Note that this only handles boxing and unboxing conversions occurring through
calls to valueOf
or one of the intValue
, byteValue
, etc. methods. Casts
that command a conversion are reported by UnnecessaryCast
instead.
This rule is defined by the following Java class: net.sourceforge.pmd.lang.java.rule.codestyle.UnnecessaryBoxingRule
Example(s):
{
// Instead of
Integer integer = Integer.valueOf(2);
// you may just write
Integer integer = 2;
int i = integer.intValue(); // similarly for unboxing
// Instead of
int x = Integer.valueOf("42");
// you may just write
int x = Integer.parseInt("42");
}
Use this rule by referencing it:
<rule ref="category/java/codestyle.xml/UnnecessaryBoxing" />
UnnecessaryCast
Since: PMD 6.24.0
Priority: Medium (3)
Minimum Language Version: Java 1.5
Detects casts which could be removed as the operand of the cast is already suitable for the context type. For instance, in the following:
Object context = (Comparable) "o";
The cast is unnecessary. This is because String
already is a subtype of both
Comparable
and Object
.
This will also flag casts that can be avoided because of the autoboxing feature of Java 5.
Integer integer = (Integer) 1;
The literal would be autoboxed to Integer
anyway.
This rule is defined by the following Java class: net.sourceforge.pmd.lang.java.rule.codestyle.UnnecessaryCastRule
Example(s):
import java.util.function.Function;
class SomeClass {
static {
Object o; long l; int i; Integer boxedInt;
// reference conversions
o = (Object) new SomeClass(); // unnecessary
o = (SomeClass) o; // necessary (narrowing cast)
o = (Comparable<String>) "string"; // unnecessary
// primitive conversions
l = (long) 2; // unnecessary
l = (long) 2.0; // necessary (narrowing cast)
l = (byte) i; // necessary (narrowing cast)
// boxing/unboxing casts (since java 5)
o = (Integer) 3; // unnecessary (autoboxing would apply)
o = (long) 3; // necessary (would be boxed to Long)
l = (int) boxedInt; // necessary (cannot cast Integer to long)
// casts that give a target type to a lambda/ method ref are necessary
o = (Function<Integer, String>) Integer::toString; // necessary (no target type)
}
}
import java.util.*;
class SomeClass {
static {
/* Casts involving access to collections were common before Java 5, because collections
* were not generic. This rule may hence be useful when converting from using a raw
* type like `List` to a parameterized type like `List<String>`.
*/
List<String> stringList = Arrays.asList("a", "b");
String element = (String) stringList.get(0); // this cast is unnecessary
}
}
Use this rule by referencing it:
<rule ref="category/java/codestyle.xml/UnnecessaryCast" />
UnnecessaryConstructor
Since: PMD 1.0
Priority: Medium (3)
This rule detects when a constructor is not necessary; i.e., when there is only one constructor and the constructor is identical to the default constructor. The default constructor should has same access modifier as the declaring class. In an enum type, the default constructor is implicitly private.
This rule is defined by the following Java class: net.sourceforge.pmd.lang.java.rule.codestyle.UnnecessaryConstructorRule
Example(s):
public class Foo {
public Foo() {}
}
This rule has the following properties:
Name | Default Value | Description |
---|---|---|
ignoredAnnotations | javax.inject.Inject , com.google.inject.Inject , org.springframework.beans.factory.annotation.Autowired | Fully qualified names of the annotation types that should be ignored by this rule |
Use this rule with the default properties by just referencing it:
<rule ref="category/java/codestyle.xml/UnnecessaryConstructor" />
Use this rule and customize it:
<rule ref="category/java/codestyle.xml/UnnecessaryConstructor">
<properties>
<property name="ignoredAnnotations" value="javax.inject.Inject,com.google.inject.Inject,org.springframework.beans.factory.annotation.Autowired" />
</properties>
</rule>
UnnecessaryFullyQualifiedName
Since: PMD 5.0
Priority: Medium Low (4)
Import statements allow the use of non-fully qualified names. The use of a fully qualified name which is covered by an import statement is redundant. Consider using the non-fully qualified name.
This rule is defined by the following Java class: net.sourceforge.pmd.lang.java.rule.codestyle.UnnecessaryFullyQualifiedNameRule
Example(s):
import java.util.List;
public class Foo {
private java.util.List list1; // Unnecessary FQN
private List list2; // More appropriate given import of 'java.util.List'
}
This rule has the following properties:
Name | Default Value | Description |
---|---|---|
reportStaticMethods | true | Report unnecessary static method qualifiers like in Collections.emptyList() , if the method is imported or inherited. |
reportStaticFields | true | Report unnecessary static field qualifiers like in Math.PI , if the field is imported or inherited. |
Use this rule with the default properties by just referencing it:
<rule ref="category/java/codestyle.xml/UnnecessaryFullyQualifiedName" />
Use this rule and customize it:
<rule ref="category/java/codestyle.xml/UnnecessaryFullyQualifiedName">
<properties>
<property name="reportStaticMethods" value="true" />
<property name="reportStaticFields" value="true" />
</properties>
</rule>
UnnecessaryImport
Since: PMD 6.34.0
Priority: Medium Low (4)
Reports import statements that can be removed. They are either unused, duplicated, or the members they import are already implicitly in scope, because they’re in java.lang, or the current package.
If some imports cannot be resolved, for instance because you run PMD with an incomplete auxiliary classpath, some imports may be conservatively marked as used even if they’re not to avoid false positives.
This rule is defined by the following Java class: net.sourceforge.pmd.lang.java.rule.codestyle.UnnecessaryImportRule
Example(s):
import java.io.File; // not used, can be removed
import java.util.Collections; // used below
import java.util.*; // so this one is not used
import java.lang.Object; // imports from java.lang, unnecessary
import java.lang.Object; // duplicate, unnecessary
public class Foo {
static Object emptyList() {
return Collections.emptyList();
}
}
Use this rule by referencing it:
<rule ref="category/java/codestyle.xml/UnnecessaryImport" />
UnnecessaryLocalBeforeReturn
Since: PMD 3.3
Priority: Medium (3)
Avoid the creation of unnecessary local variables
This rule is defined by the following Java class: net.sourceforge.pmd.lang.java.rule.codestyle.UnnecessaryLocalBeforeReturnRule
Example(s):
public class Foo {
public int foo() {
int x = doSomething();
return x; // instead, just 'return doSomething();'
}
}
This rule has the following properties:
Name | Default Value | Description |
---|---|---|
statementOrderMatters | true | If set to false this rule no longer requires the variable declaration and return statement to be on consecutive lines. Any variable that is used solely in a return statement will be reported. |
Use this rule with the default properties by just referencing it:
<rule ref="category/java/codestyle.xml/UnnecessaryLocalBeforeReturn" />
Use this rule and customize it:
<rule ref="category/java/codestyle.xml/UnnecessaryLocalBeforeReturn">
<properties>
<property name="statementOrderMatters" value="true" />
</properties>
</rule>
UnnecessaryModifier
Since: PMD 1.02
Priority: Medium (3)
Fields in interfaces and annotations are automatically public static final
, and methods are public abstract
.
Classes, interfaces or annotations nested in an interface or annotation are automatically public static
(all nested interfaces and annotations are automatically static).
Nested enums are automatically static
.
For historical reasons, modifiers which are implied by the context are accepted by the compiler, but are superfluous.
This rule is defined by the following Java class: net.sourceforge.pmd.lang.java.rule.codestyle.UnnecessaryModifierRule
Example(s):
public @interface Annotation {
public abstract void bar(); // both abstract and public are ignored by the compiler
public static final int X = 0; // public, static, and final all ignored
public static class Bar {} // public, static ignored
public static interface Baz {} // ditto
}
public interface Foo {
public abstract void bar(); // both abstract and public are ignored by the compiler
public static final int X = 0; // public, static, and final all ignored
public static class Bar {} // public, static ignored
public static interface Baz {} // ditto
}
public class Bar {
public static interface Baz {} // static ignored
public static enum FoorBar { // static ignored
FOO;
}
}
public class FooClass {
static record BarRecord() {} // static ignored
}
public interface FooInterface {
static record BarRecord() {} // static ignored
}
Use this rule by referencing it:
<rule ref="category/java/codestyle.xml/UnnecessaryModifier" />
UnnecessaryReturn
Since: PMD 1.3
Priority: Medium (3)
Avoid the use of unnecessary return statements. A return is unnecessary when no instructions follow anyway.
This rule is defined by the following Java class: net.sourceforge.pmd.lang.java.rule.codestyle.UnnecessaryReturnRule
Example(s):
public class Foo {
public void bar() {
int x = 42;
return;
}
}
Use this rule by referencing it:
<rule ref="category/java/codestyle.xml/UnnecessaryReturn" />
UnnecessarySemicolon
Since: PMD 6.46.0
Priority: Medium (3)
Reports unnecessary semicolons (so called "empty statements" and "empty declarations"). These can be removed without changing the program. The Java grammar allows them for historical reasons, but they should be avoided.
This rule will not report empty statements that are syntactically required, for instance, because they are the body of a control statement.
This rule replaces EmptyStatementNotInLoop.
This rule is defined by the following XPath expression:
(: empty declarations :)
//EmptyDeclaration
(: empty statements :)
| //Block/EmptyStatement
Example(s):
class Foo {
{
toString();; // one of these semicolons is unnecessary
if (true); // this semicolon is not unnecessary, but it could be an empty block instead (not reported)
}
}; // this semicolon is unnecessary
Use this rule by referencing it:
<rule ref="category/java/codestyle.xml/UnnecessarySemicolon" />
UseDiamondOperator
Since: PMD 6.11.0
Priority: Medium (3)
Minimum Language Version: Java 1.7
In some cases, explicit type arguments in a constructor call for a generic type
may be replaced by diamond type arguments (<>
), and be inferred by the compiler.
This rule recommends that you use diamond type arguments anywhere possible, since
it avoids duplication of the type arguments, and makes the code more concise and readable.
This rule is useful when upgrading a codebase to Java 1.7, Java 1.8, or Java 9. The diamond syntax was first introduced in Java 1.7. In Java 8, improvements in Java’s type inference made more type arguments redundant. In Java 9, type arguments inference was made possible for anonymous class constructors.
This rule is defined by the following Java class: net.sourceforge.pmd.lang.java.rule.codestyle.UseDiamondOperatorRule
Example(s):
import java.util.*;
class Foo {
static {
List<String> strings;
strings = new ArrayList<String>(); // unnecessary duplication of type parameters
strings = new ArrayList<>(); // using diamond type arguments is more concise
strings = new ArrayList(); // accidental use of a raw type, you can use ArrayList<> instead
strings = new ArrayList<>() {
// for anonymous classes, this is possible since Java 9 only
};
}
}
Use this rule by referencing it:
<rule ref="category/java/codestyle.xml/UseDiamondOperator" />
UseExplicitTypes
Since: PMD 7.0.0
Priority: Medium (3)
Minimum Language Version: Java 10
Java 10 introduced the var
keyword. This reduces the amount of code written because java can infer the type
from the initializer of the variable declaration.
This is essentially a trade-off: On the one hand, it can make code more readable by eliminating redundant
information. On the other hand, it can make code less readable by eliding useful information. There is no
blanket rule for when var
should be used or shouldn’t.
It may make sense to use var
when the type is inherently clear upon reading the statement
(ie: assignment to either a literal value or a constructor call). Those use cases
can be enabled through properties.
Notice that lambda parameters are allowed, as they are already inferred by default (the var
keyword
is completely optional).
See also Local Variable Type Inference Style Guidelines.
This rule is defined by the following XPath expression:
//LocalVariableDeclaration[@TypeInferred = true()]
[not(VariableDeclarator[*[pmd-java:nodeIs("Literal")]]) or $allowLiterals = false()]
[not(VariableDeclarator[ConstructorCall]) or $allowCtors = false()]
This rule has the following properties:
Name | Default Value | Description |
---|---|---|
allowLiterals | false | Allow when variables are directly initialized with literals |
allowCtors | false | Allow when variables are directly initialized with a constructor call |
Use this rule with the default properties by just referencing it:
<rule ref="category/java/codestyle.xml/UseExplicitTypes" />
Use this rule and customize it:
<rule ref="category/java/codestyle.xml/UseExplicitTypes">
<properties>
<property name="allowLiterals" value="false" />
<property name="allowCtors" value="false" />
</properties>
</rule>
UselessParentheses
Since: PMD 5.0
Priority: Medium Low (4)
Parenthesized expressions are used to override the default operator precedence rules. Parentheses whose removal would not change the relative nesting of operators are unnecessary, because they don’t change the semantics of the enclosing expression.
Some parentheses that strictly speaking are unnecessary, may still be considered useful for readability. This rule allows to ignore violations on two kinds of unnecessary parentheses:
- "Clarifying" parentheses, which separate operators of difference precedence. While
unnecessary, they make precedence rules explicit, which may be useful for rarely used
operators. For example:
(a + b) & c // is equivalent to `a + b & c`, but probably clearer
Unset the property
ignoreClarifying
to report them. - "Balancing" parentheses, which are unnecessary but visually balance out another pair
of parentheses around an equality operator. For example, those two expressions are equivalent:
(a == null) != (b == null) a == null != (b == null)
The parentheses on the right are required, and the parentheses on the left are just more visually pleasing. Unset the property
ignoreBalancing
to report them.
This rule is defined by the following Java class: net.sourceforge.pmd.lang.java.rule.codestyle.UselessParenthesesRule
Example(s):
public class Foo {
{
int n = 0;
n = (n); // here
n = (n * 2) * 3; // and here
n = n * (2 * 3); // and here
}
}
This rule has the following properties:
Name | Default Value | Description |
---|---|---|
ignoreClarifying | true | Ignore parentheses that separate expressions of difference precedence, like in (a % 2 == 0) ? x : -x |
ignoreBalancing | true | Ignore unnecessary parentheses that appear balanced around an equality operator, because the other operand requires parentheses.For example, in (a == null) == (b == null) , only the second pair of parentheses is necessary, but the expression is clearer that way. |
Use this rule with the default properties by just referencing it:
<rule ref="category/java/codestyle.xml/UselessParentheses" />
Use this rule and customize it:
<rule ref="category/java/codestyle.xml/UselessParentheses">
<properties>
<property name="ignoreClarifying" value="true" />
<property name="ignoreBalancing" value="true" />
</properties>
</rule>
UselessQualifiedThis
Since: PMD 5.4.0
Priority: Medium (3)
Reports qualified this usages in the same class.
This rule is defined by the following XPath expression:
//ThisExpression/ClassType
[ ancestor::*[pmd-java:nodeIs('TypeDeclaration')][1]/@SimpleName = ./@SimpleName ]
Example(s):
public class Foo {
final Foo otherFoo = Foo.this; // use "this" directly
public void doSomething() {
final Foo anotherFoo = Foo.this; // use "this" directly
}
private ActionListener returnListener() {
return new ActionListener() {
@Override
public void actionPerformed(ActionEvent e) {
doSomethingWithQualifiedThis(Foo.this); // This is fine
}
};
}
private class Foo3 {
final Foo myFoo = Foo.this; // This is fine
}
private class Foo2 {
final Foo2 myFoo2 = Foo2.this; // Use "this" direclty
}
}
Use this rule by referencing it:
<rule ref="category/java/codestyle.xml/UselessQualifiedThis" />
UseShortArrayInitializer
Since: PMD 6.15.0
Priority: Medium (3)
When declaring and initializing array fields or variables, it is not necessary to explicitly create a new array
using new
. Instead one can simply define the initial content of the array as a expression in curly braces.
E.g. int[] x = new int[] { 1, 2, 3 };
can be written as int[] x = { 1, 2, 3 };
.
This rule is defined by the following XPath expression:
//VariableDeclarator
[VariableId[@TypeInferred = false() and @ArrayType = true()]]
[ArrayAllocation/ArrayInitializer]
Example(s):
Foo[] x = new Foo[] { ... }; // Overly verbose
Foo[] x = { ... }; //Equivalent to above line
Use this rule by referencing it:
<rule ref="category/java/codestyle.xml/UseShortArrayInitializer" />
UseUnderscoresInNumericLiterals
Since: PMD 6.10.0
Priority: Medium (3)
Minimum Language Version: Java 1.7
Since Java 1.7, numeric literals can use underscores to separate digits. This rule enforces that numeric literals above a certain length use these underscores to increase readability.
The rule only supports decimal (base 10) literals for now. The acceptable length under which literals are not required to have underscores is configurable via a property. Even under that length, underscores that are misplaced (not making groups of 3 digits) are reported.
This rule is defined by the following XPath expression:
//NumericLiteral
(: Filter out literals in base other than 10 :)
[@Base = 10]
(: Filter out ignored field name :)
[not(ancestor::VariableDeclarator[1][@Name = 'serialVersionUID'])]
[
some $num in tokenize(@Image, "[dDfFlLeE+\-]")
satisfies not(
( contains($num, ".")
and string-length(substring-before($num, ".")) <= $acceptableDecimalLength
and string-length(substring-after($num, ".")) <= $acceptableDecimalLength
or string-length($num) <= $acceptableDecimalLength
)
and not(contains($num,"_"))
or matches($num, "^[0-9]{1,3}(_[0-9]{3})*(\.([0-9]{3}_)*[0-9]{1,3})?$")
)
]
Example(s):
public class Foo {
private int num = 1000000; // should be 1_000_000
}
This rule has the following properties:
Name | Default Value | Description |
---|---|---|
acceptableDecimalLength | 4 | Length under which literals in base 10 are not required to have underscores |
Use this rule with the default properties by just referencing it:
<rule ref="category/java/codestyle.xml/UseUnderscoresInNumericLiterals" />
Use this rule and customize it:
<rule ref="category/java/codestyle.xml/UseUnderscoresInNumericLiterals">
<properties>
<property name="acceptableDecimalLength" value="4" />
</properties>
</rule>