AvoidDebugStatements
Since: PMD 6.36.0
Priority: Medium (3)
Debug statements contribute to longer transactions and consume Apex CPU time even when debug logs are not being captured.
When possible make use of other debugging techniques such as the Apex Replay Debugger and Checkpoints that could cover most use cases.
For other valid use cases that the statement is in fact valid make use of the @SuppressWarnings
annotation or the //NOPMD
comment.
This rule is defined by the following XPath expression:
//MethodCallExpression[lower-case(@FullMethodName)='system.debug']
Example(s):
public class Foo {
public void bar() {
Account acc = [SELECT Name, Owner.Name FROM Account LIMIT 1];
System.debug(accs); // will get reported
}
@SuppressWarnings('PMD.AvoidDebugStatements')
public void baz() {
try {
Account myAccount = bar();
} catch (Exception e) {
System.debug(LoggingLevel.ERROR, e.getMessage()); // good to go
}
}
}
Use this rule by referencing it:
<rule ref="category/apex/performance.xml/AvoidDebugStatements" />
AvoidDmlStatementsInLoops
Deprecated
Since: PMD 5.5.0
Priority: Medium (3)
Avoid DML statements inside loops to avoid hitting the DML governor limit. Instead, try to batch up the data into a list and invoke your DML once on that list of data outside the loop.
Note: This rule is deprecated since PMD 6.29.0 and will be removed with PMD 7.0.0. The rule is replaced
by the more general rule OperationWithLimitsInLoop
.
This rule is defined by the following Java class: net.sourceforge.pmd.lang.apex.rule.performance.AvoidDmlStatementsInLoopsRule
Example(s):
public class Something {
public void foo() {
for (Integer i = 0; i < 151; i++) {
Account account;
// ...
insert account;
}
}
}
Use this rule by referencing it:
<rule ref="category/apex/performance.xml/AvoidDmlStatementsInLoops" />
AvoidSoqlInLoops
Deprecated
Since: PMD 5.5.0
Priority: Medium (3)
New objects created within loops should be checked to see if they can created outside them and reused.
Note: This rule is deprecated since PMD 6.29.0 and will be removed with PMD 7.0.0. The rule is replaced
by the more general rule OperationWithLimitsInLoop
.
This rule is defined by the following Java class: net.sourceforge.pmd.lang.apex.rule.performance.AvoidSoqlInLoopsRule
Example(s):
public class Something {
public static void main( String as[] ) {
for (Integer i = 0; i < 10; i++) {
List<Account> accounts = [SELECT Id FROM Account];
}
}
}
Use this rule by referencing it:
<rule ref="category/apex/performance.xml/AvoidSoqlInLoops" />
AvoidSoslInLoops
Deprecated
Since: PMD 6.0.0
Priority: Medium (3)
Sosl calls within loops can cause governor limit exceptions.
Note: This rule is deprecated since PMD 6.29.0 and will be removed with PMD 7.0.0. The rule is replaced
by the more general rule OperationWithLimitsInLoop
.
This rule is defined by the following Java class: net.sourceforge.pmd.lang.apex.rule.performance.AvoidSoslInLoopsRule
Example(s):
public class Something {
public static void main( String as[] ) {
for (Integer i = 0; i < 10; i++) {
List<List<SObject>> searchList = [FIND 'map*' IN ALL FIELDS RETURNING Account (Id, Name), Contact, Opportunity, Lead];
}
}
}
Use this rule by referencing it:
<rule ref="category/apex/performance.xml/AvoidSoslInLoops" />
EagerlyLoadedDescribeSObjectResult
Since: PMD 6.40.0
Priority: Medium (3)
This rule finds DescribeSObjectResult
s which could have been loaded eagerly via SObjectType.getDescribe()
.
When using SObjectType.getDescribe()
or Schema.describeSObjects()
without supplying a SObjectDescribeOptions
,
implicitly it will be using SObjectDescribeOptions.DEFAULT
and then all
child relationships will be loaded eagerly regardless whether this information is needed or not.
This has a potential negative performance impact. Instead SObjectType.getDescribe(options)
or Schema.describeSObjects(SObjectTypes, options)
should be used and a SObjectDescribeOptions
should be supplied. By using
SObjectDescribeOptions.DEFERRED
the describe attributes will be lazily initialized at first use.
Lazy loading DescribeSObjectResult
on picklist fields is not always recommended. The lazy loaded
describe objects might not be 100% accurate. It might be safer to explicitly use
SObjectDescribeOptions.FULL
in such a case. The same applies when you need the same DescribeSObjectResult
to be consistent across different contexts and API versions.
Properties:
noDefault
: The behavior ofSObjectDescribeOptions.DEFAULT
changes from API Version 43 to 44: With API Version 43, the attributes are loaded eagerly. With API Version 44, they are loaded lazily. Simply usingSObjectDescribeOptions.DEFAULT
doesn’t automatically make use of lazy loading. (unless “Use Improved Schema Caching” critical update is applied,SObjectDescribeOptions.DEFAULT
does fallback to lazy loading) With this property enabled, such usages are found. You might ignore this, if you can make sure, that you don’t run a mix of API Versions.
This rule is defined by the following XPath expression:
//MethodCallExpression
[
lower-case(@MethodName) = "getdescribe" and ReferenceExpression[@SObjectType = true()]
or lower-case(@MethodName) = "describesobjects"
]
[not(VariableExpression/ReferenceExpression
[lower-case(@Image) = ("sobjectdescribeoptions", "fielddescribeoptions")]
)
]
|
//ReferenceExpression
[$noDefault = true()]
[lower-case(@Image) = "sobjectdescribeoptions"]
[parent::VariableExpression[lower-case(@Image) = "default"]]
Example(s):
public class Foo {
public static void bar(List<Account> accounts) {
if (Account.SObjectType.getDescribe(SObjectDescribeOptions.DEFERRED).isCreateable()) {
insert accounts;
}
}
}
This rule has the following properties:
Name | Default Value | Description | Multivalued |
---|---|---|---|
noDefault | false | Do not allow SObjectDescribeOptions.DEFAULT option to ensure consistent results no matter where getDescribe is called | no |
Use this rule with the default properties by just referencing it:
<rule ref="category/apex/performance.xml/EagerlyLoadedDescribeSObjectResult" />
Use this rule and customize it:
<rule ref="category/apex/performance.xml/EagerlyLoadedDescribeSObjectResult">
<properties>
<property name="noDefault" value="false" />
</properties>
</rule>
OperationWithLimitsInLoop
Since: PMD 6.29.0
Priority: Medium (3)
Database class methods, DML operations, SOQL queries, SOSL queries, Approval class methods, Email sending, async scheduling or queueing within loops can cause governor limit exceptions. Instead, try to batch up the data into a list and invoke the operation once on that list of data outside the loop.
This rule is defined by the following Java class: net.sourceforge.pmd.lang.apex.rule.performance.OperationWithLimitsInLoopRule
Example(s):
public class Something {
public void databaseMethodInsideOfLoop(List<Account> accounts) {
for (Account a : accounts) {
Database.insert(a);
}
}
public void dmlInsideOfLoop() {
for (Integer i = 0; i < 151; i++) {
Account account;
// ...
insert account;
}
}
public void soqlInsideOfLoop() {
for (Integer i = 0; i < 10; i++) {
List<Account> accounts = [SELECT Id FROM Account];
}
}
public void soslInsideOfLoop() {
for (Integer i = 0; i < 10; i++) {
List<List<SObject>> searchList = [FIND 'map*' IN ALL FIELDS RETURNING Account (Id, Name), Contact, Opportunity, Lead];
}
}
public void messageInsideOfLoop() {
for (Integer i = 0; i < 10; i++) {
Messaging.SingleEmailMessage email = new Messaging.SingleEmailMessage();
Messaging.sendEmail(new Messaging.SingleEmailMessage[]{email});
}
}
public void approvalInsideOfLoop(Account[] accs) {
for (Integer i = 0; i < 10; i++) {
Account acc = accs[i];
Approval.ProcessSubmitRequest req = new Approval.ProcessSubmitRequest();
req.setObjectId(acc.Id);
Approval.process(req);
Approval.lock(acc);
Approval.unlock(acc);
}
}
public void asyncInsideOfLoop() {
for (Integer i = 0; i < 10; i++) {
System.enqueueJob(new MyQueueable());
System.schedule('x', '0 0 0 1 1 ?', new MySchedule());
System.scheduleBatch(new MyBatch(), 'x', 1);
}
}
}
Use this rule by referencing it:
<rule ref="category/apex/performance.xml/OperationWithLimitsInLoop" />